Tuesday, September 20, 2005

PAYING FOR KATRINA

By William Fisher

Advertising gurus Gerald Rafshoon and Doug Bailey, who were on opposing sides during the Jimmy Carter-Gerald Ford campaign in 1976, have come up with a pretty good alternative to financing Katrina reconstruction with taxpayer money.

They propose a 90-day moratorium on fundraising by political parties and members of Congress. That would free up more than enough money to pay for
Katrina.

Here’s another:

Instead of closing 22 major military bases and ‘realigning’ 33 others, we should keep those facilities open so that no one has to flee to anything like the New Orleans Astrodome or the Convention Center ever again.

Think about it: Military bases have barracks and apartments, with beds, blankets, drinking water and plumbing that works. They have medical facilities with doctors and nurses, lawyers, PXs, even supermarkets. They have trucks and cars and ships and helicopters and airplanes. And they are located all over the country, within easy reach of just about any site of a natural disaster.

The Base Realignment and Closing Commission (BRAC) says doing away with these assets will save the taxpayers $4.2 billion a year.

But there’s another way to save that money, and a lot more: Stop the unconscionable waste at the Department of Defense.

So vast is the Pentagon’s waste, fraud and abuse that the government’s accountants tell us every year that the place simply cannot be audited. If Donald Rumsfeld ran Wal-Mart that way, he’d have been fired long ago.

Just think of it: The DOD, whose profligate and dysfunctional systems allowed it to buy toilet seats for $640 each, is now unable to account for more than a trillion – that’s trillion with a ‘T’ -- dollars in financial transactions. That’s in addition to the dozens of tanks, missiles and planes that have simply ‘gone missing’.

Congress gave our military $10 billion for Iraq Reconstruction. A good chunk of that money has simply vanished – it’s been lost. And there is virtually no reconstruction to show for it.

And, in one more of a long litany of incompetence and malfeasance, the General Accountability Office (GAO) informed us recently that millions of dollars worth of new equipment was being sold as ‘surplus’ for pennies on the dollar. That equipment included Kevlar flak jackets needed by the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, so of course the Pentagon ordered more.

If President Bush is looking for ‘offsets’ to pay for Katrina, he shouldn’t be thinking about cutting back on Medicaid, No Child Left Behind, Social Security, and other programs that directly benefit those most devastated by Katrina.

He should take a look at the ‘offsets’ already in the Pentagon’s appropriations – if he can find them.

And if, by some miracle, he succeeds there where all others have failed, he should start rummaging through the pork barrel that was used to deliver the Highway and Transportation Bill to the White House for him to sign. The one with the millions earmarked for Alaska to build that bridge to nowhere.

18 comments:

  1. In what time frame was that trillion dollars lost? Interesting article, if you paid a billion dollars to have a few thousand accountants sudit the DOD then they would easily pay for themselves.
    Oh and if you want to get rid of spam comments like the one before mine you can turn on word verification, go to settings the comments and there is a check box for word verification. it adds one step before posting a comment but at least it gets rid of annoying spam.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi BILL, I was just blog surfing and found you! I really like your site. If you are interested, go see my ebay auctions site. You can't help but wonder, do people really sell this stuff??

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello weird ebay pulse auctions, I was just blog searching and found you! I really like your blog. If you are interested, go see my weird ebay pulse auctions site. It's related to eBay auctions. Can you believe people really sell this stuff??

    ReplyDelete
  4. Think that could give you some Search Engine popularity, and traffic???

    ReplyDelete
  5. BILL, I came across your site while blog surfing around (something I like to do when I'm board :-). You have a really cool blog. If you are interested, go see my curious auctions site. It's just a fun site but you may find something to entertain you. You can't help but wonder though... do people really sell this stuff??

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. to all of the major RSS feed directories on the Internet.

    ReplyDelete
  9. blog italianwww.wirtualnafrancja.com
    Nice Site! Good Work ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. What If This Could All Happen Automatically,
    with a simple push of a button.....

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Excellent site, enjoyed my visit! I will be back soon!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Excellent site, enjoyed my visit! I will be back soon!

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I never realised how important a good bed was until I got a bad back�.
    Over 1,400 members of BackCare, the national organisation for healthy backs, responded to our Back Your Bed survey - the first of its kind to explore the views on beds of those who suffer from bad backs and the experts who treat them.
    SUMMARY OF THE BACK YOUR BED SURVEY RESULTS
    Buying a good bed is one of the most important purchases you can make when it comes to back pain relief. Nine out of 10 say their bed is more important to them since they developed back pain; 98% agreed that a good, supportive bed could help a bad back. 82% of experts felt that the right bed could help prevent back pain.
    "If you cannot rest properly and sleep well, this hinders recovery from back problems."
    A firm, supportive bed, not a hard one, can do wonders to ease and even prevent bad backs. Only 22% of sufferers had bought a bed classed as �orthopaedic�; while 28% describe their bed support as �medium�. Only 6% of experts would recommend an orthopaedic bed to patients.

    Three quarters would be prepared to spend more than �500 on a new bed: compared with just 36% of the �normal� population. Nearly one in 10 would pay more than �2,000 for a new bed to get the comfort and relief they need.
    Back pain sufferers are twice as likely as the rest of the population to own a new bed - 50% have beds that are less than five years old compared to the national average of 24%.
    88% are satisfied with their choice � but 16% said they would get a better quality one next time; while 9% would opt for something firmer; 5% said they would choose a softer bed and 4% wanted a bigger one.

    Sufferers are three times more likely to replace their beds when they no longer feel comfortable (65% compared with just 20%).
    31% own a king size bed compared with 11% generally. Separate mattresses zipped together are also popular with couples whose support needs differ or who are easily disturbed by their partner's movements. top
    So worth considering when buying a

    ReplyDelete
  16. Shop at your favorite stores 24 hours a day. Why go to the mall when you can shop online and avoid the traffic

    ReplyDelete
  17. good information

    ReplyDelete
  18. If you are trying to maximize the space in your room, consider purchasing a loft bed or bunk bed to elevate your sleeping area.Find out more about bed bunk full twin

    ReplyDelete